[186408] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Wed Dec 16 18:25:11 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <D29747F0.11F8D4%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:25:06 -0600
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
If it were only so easy...
On Dec 16, 2015 4:41 PM, "Livingood, Jason" <
Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> IPv4 NAT!? Free yourself from the tyranny of shared addresses. ;-)
>
> http://www.comcast6.net/images/files/revolt.jpg
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On 12/15/15, 1:08 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Ahmed Munaf"
> <nanog-bounces+jason_livingood=cable.comcast.com@nanog.org on behalf of
> ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net> wrote:
>
> >Dear All,
> >
> >We are using cisco for natting, we'd like to change it to another brand
> >like A10 or Citrix.
> >
> >Please any advice regarding the three brands and what are the advantages
> >and disadvantages for each one?
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
