[186225] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri Dec 4 21:56:12 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:50:28 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=rc8HHAG6tfYtkuHi4J7vDdwEQ+ETojn0W5X0HD+8uzUA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> No, it's not an issue of A not peering
> with B, it's A selling "internet transit"
> for a known subset of the internet
> rather than the whole kit and kaboodle.

right.  then hurricane and cogent should both
make clear that they do not provide ipv6 transit
to the entire internet.

randy

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post