[186215] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul WALL)
Fri Dec 4 12:03:41 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAAGWaEf1Sq1EVN1Axo6zzp_r7oWx869P0U1nFwnVmoPMywY8tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:03:37 -0500
From: Paul WALL <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Walter <jwalter@weebly.com>
Cc: North American Networking and Offtopic Gripes List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Jeff Walter <jwalter@weebly.com> wrote:
> That cake will haunt NANOG until the end of time.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr> wrote:
>
>> On Tue Dec 1 14:39:14 2015, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>> > Might I suggest cake pleas?
>>
>> You mean
>>
>> http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Hurricane-Cake.jpg
>> ?
>>
i mean
"Different companies have different personalities, and the vast
majority work through their relationships fine in the interest of the
public and the industry. But there are always a few companies that
like to act out on the public stage to achieve their business
objectives."
--Mike Leber, 6/29/15 Telecom Ramblings
along with the bad spelling, we have short memories. peering is about
mutual benefits. when benefits aren't there peering doesn't happen.
going to nanog and yelling about peering by saying that you're a
victim isn't a mutual benefit last i checked. their lack of peering
doesn't demand another moment of our attention. choose wisely.
Drive slow,
Paul WALL
