[186195] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Walter)
Thu Dec 3 16:39:39 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGUuo1YgeeY=EuwUhfWL3yAjXv5aJBA2iqvfOhFDAQDMsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:39:36 -0800
From: Jeff Walter <jwalter@weebly.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: Jared Geiger <jared@compuwizz.net>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
As funny as that would be, it would never happen. Cogent thinks they're the
biggest. HE is the biggest (last I checked). HE wants to peer. Cogent wants
HE to pay for transit. Cake reference. Still partitioned.
How do you get them connected? I hate to say it, but it would take a major
shift within Cogent. In the meantime your best option to see the whole IPv6
internet is to pay Cogent and to get free v6 transit with HE over an
exchange or tunnel.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Jared Geiger <jared@compuwizz.net> wrote:
> > Wouldn't this be a Net Neutrality issue now or would it fall on HE for
> not
> > willing to buy transit to Cogent IPv6?
>
> Wouldn't it fall on Cogent for being unwilling to buy transit from HE?
> HE is the IPv6 leader in the game.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
> --
> William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
>
