[18614] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BBN Peering issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland M.J. Meyer)
Wed Aug 12 13:53:23 1998
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:36:51 -0700
To: alex@nac.net
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>, nanog@merit.edu, alex@nt.nac.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980812125412.3051E-100000@iago.nac.net>
How is this differnt than the case with Sprint?
At 12:59 PM 8/12/98 -0400, alex@nac.net wrote:
>
>Depending on who gives in first, and when.
>
>If Exodus breaks down and purchases connectivity from someone to get to
>BBN, then obviously is will not effect BBN in the slightest. If Exodus
>buys BBN routes from someone other than BBN (sprint, mci), then it gets
>quite funny; more PX's or MAE's get overloaded with traffic that was
>privately between Exodus and BBN, and BBN has caused one of its
>competitors (MCI/Sprint/whoever Exodus ends up buying from (if they do))
>to gain more revunue flow.
>
>Considering that BBN is the one who cut peering with Exodus, I presume
>Exodus will have a bad taste in thier mouth, and not buy from BBN (I could
>guess that BBN assumed this also).
>
>With all this in mond, BBN, IMHO, made a horrendously poor choice.
>
>BBN, turning peering into a boys club.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer, ISOC (InterNIC RM993)
e-mail: <mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com>rmeyer@mhsc.com
Internet phone: hawk.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: <http://www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer>www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: <http://www.mhsc.com/>www.mhsc.com/
___________________________________________
SecureMail from MHSC.NET is coming soon!
