|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> In-Reply-To: <5654DBE0.1020506@xs4all.net> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:58:42 -0800 To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org > On Nov 24, 2015, at 13:51 , Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> = wrote: >=20 > On 24/11/15 22:47, Owen DeLong wrote: >>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:27 , Miquel van Smoorenburg = <mikevs@xs4all.net> wrote: >>> In article <xs4all.85AC9398-125E-4078-86DA-63962DF76662@delong.com> = you write: >>>> Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of = development >>>> and real running code for complete implementations throughout any >>>> sort of site hierarchy. >>>=20 >>> Well, it works for us. >>=20 >> What size prefix are you delegating to those end users? >=20 > A /48. >=20 > Mike. Exactly=E2=80=A6 This discussion wasn=E2=80=99t about can or can=E2=80=99t= IPv6. The topic of hierarchy came up when someone mentioned getting a /56 from their provider and I pointed = out that anyone receiving a /56 should contact their provider and request a proper /48. Owen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |