[186053] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Nov 24 16:48:58 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <201511241927.tAOJR92k002867@xs9.xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:47:45 -0800
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:27 , Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> In article <xs4all.85AC9398-125E-4078-86DA-63962DF76662@delong.com> =
you write:
>> Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of =
development
>> and real running code for complete implementations throughout any
>> sort of site hierarchy.
>=20
> Well, it works for us. Connect a second router (Fritz!box) behind
> the primary one and it works. We can't see how many customers
> actually do that but potentially it could be hunderds of thousands,
> so in practice it's still thousands or tens of thousands.
>=20
> I'm always amused by people saying IPv6 is difficult or impossible
> for various reasons and that real implementations of X and Y
> do not exist while we've been doing it for years. Probably because
> we didn't really know what we were getting into and simply started.
> The only way progress is ever made, it seems :)
>=20
> Mike.
What size prefix are you delegating to those end users?
Owen