[186037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Mon Nov 23 17:43:33 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:42:41 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <23F26346-ED30-4115-8FEC-9078604F3EDC@microsoft.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* chkuhtz@microsoft.com (Christian Kuhtz) [Mon 23 Nov 2015, 19:43 CET]:
>I don't know if this is NN or not, but the concept is ancient. Even
>back in the dark ages of mobile, zero rating and associated rev
>share were very common.
>
>Whether this is relevant to NN or not is for lawyers.
This is backwards. It's definitely a net neutrality issue since it
concerns inequal access for customers to content on the Internet.
Whether it's subject to current laws or regulation is a matter for the
lawyers, but current laws and regulations at least in the US are a far
cry from actual net neutrality. (If you want a good example of that,
look to the Netherlands.)
-- Niels.