[186037] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Mon Nov 23 17:43:33 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:42:41 +0100
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <23F26346-ED30-4115-8FEC-9078604F3EDC@microsoft.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

* chkuhtz@microsoft.com (Christian Kuhtz) [Mon 23 Nov 2015, 19:43 CET]:
>I don't know if this is NN or not, but the concept is ancient. Even 
>back in the dark ages of mobile, zero rating and associated rev 
>share were very common.
>
>Whether this is relevant to NN or not is for lawyers.

This is backwards.  It's definitely a net neutrality issue since it 
concerns inequal access for customers to content on the Internet.  
Whether it's subject to current laws or regulation is a matter for the 
lawyers, but current laws and regulations at least in the US are a far 
cry from actual net neutrality.  (If you want a good example of that, 
look to the Netherlands.)


	-- Niels.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post