[185964] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: bad announcement taxonomy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Nov 20 09:07:11 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <B0DA4F53AFA26C40877B146E271455380246C76E62@KSTLMEXCP04MBX.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:05:42 -0500
To: "Baker, Byrn" <Byrn.Baker@charter.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Did someone say NAT?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8
- Jared
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Baker, Byrn <Byrn.Baker@charter.com> wrote:
>
> Don't get on Kens bad side.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ken Matlock
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 12:44 PM
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: bad announcement taxonomy
>
> Origin NAT? ;)
>
> Ken
>
>> On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:15 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:21:32 -0600, David Edelman said:
>>> How about Origin Obfuscation
>>
>> Obfuscation implies intent. Most leaks and mis-announcements don't
>> have intent because they're whoopsies.
