[185910] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: bad announcement taxonomy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Wed Nov 18 06:55:01 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2bnar62qe.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:51:20 -0500
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> some friends and i were talking about recent routing cfs, and found we
> needed a clearer taxonomy. i throw this out.
>
> leak - i receive P and send it on to folk to whom i should not send
> it for business reasons (transit, peer, ...)
>
> mis-origination - i originate P when i do not own it
>
> hijack - an intentional mis-origination
>
> 7007 - i receive P (or some sub/superset), process it in some way
> (likely through my igp), and re-originate it, or part of it,
> as my own
>
> we need a name for 7007 other then vinnie
mis-origination. When you non-maliciously announce P as if you own it
(even though you do not) the exact details of how you screwed the
pooch are not externally important. And we have enough obscure names
for things as it is.
-Bill
--
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
