[185874] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Project Fi and the Great Firewall
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Sun Nov 15 12:21:49 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAB2RJyj-6+5nhAOkFufR50a9b1V+4DWmgA0AZcxQWsfBHTChYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:21:46 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Todd Underwood <toddunder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not both? So sad when you have to choose a single oppressive regime to
> track your internet use.
to be fair, probably:
o china sees the local mobile and can easily unwrap the probably not
encrypted outer packet headers to get your 'metadata'
o five-eyes sees the over-water transimission(s) and does the same as above
o US folk see at the GPRx in the US
So really there's 6 regimes all repressive, in their own right, involved.
> T
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015, 09:04 Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> > This is what roaming data means, Your data packet is simply trunked to
>> > your original operator to process. So you will be having a US ip on
>> > the web.
>>
>> And continuity of US tracking of your use rather than temporary Chinese
>> tracking
>>
>> brandon
>>
