[185805] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another puck.nether.net Outage?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (virendra rode)
Fri Nov 13 13:46:42 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: virendra rode <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3d72da88.kqhkiG.1510173c4cd@slabnet.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:56:03 -0800
To: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Thank you for reaching out.
Will update outages wiki so people can reach admins directly for future refe=
rence.
Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.=20
regards,
outages team=20
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:25 AM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com> wrote:
>=20
> The problem seems to have been with mailman. I pinged Jared OOB and he res=
ponded this that it's fixed. I'd sent something to outages-request prior to t=
est, and that came through this morning.
> --
> Hugo
> hugo@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber
> also on Signal
>=20
> ---- From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> -- Sent: 2015-11-1=
3 - 06:46 ----
>=20
>> Received: from puck.nether.net (localhost [IPv6:::1])
>> by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25969540762;
>> Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:05:01 -0500 (EST)
>>=20
>> puck seems to be processing mail...
>>=20
>> $ w
>> 09:45:28 up 2 days, 11:30, 2 users,
>>=20
>> $ mailq | grep cisco-nsp | wc -l
>> 174
>>=20
>> $ mailq | grep pumpk | wc -l
>> 0
>>=20
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Crist Clark <cjc+nanog@pumpky.net> wro=
te:
>>> There hasn't been a any traffic on the puck.nether.net list to which I a=
m
>>> subscribed since the 10th. I sent something to cisco-nsp yesterday and
>>> retried today, and nothing has come through.
>>>=20
>>> Is it me or puck?
>>>=20
>>> I apologize for using NANOG for this, but jared's email is puck.nether.n=
et
>>> too; something OOB is needed. I know there are many, many people here wh=
o
>>> also follow puck.nether.net lists and some may have another way to reach=
>>> him.
>=20
>=20
