[185717] in North American Network Operators' Group
=?utf-8?Q?Re=3A_Favorite_GPON_Vendor=3F?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn L)
Tue Nov 10 08:27:50 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:27:46 -0500 (EST)
From: "Shawn L" <shawnl@up.net>
To: "nanog" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <22699042.434.1447097920305.JavaMail.art@DQT6ZQ1>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
=0AWe like Calix's gpon gear, especially the E7 series. Though it's on the=
higher side price-wise than others. Manageable through their CMS software=
, the web, or command line. We tend to use their CMS software for most thi=
ngs, but the CLI is decent, and gives you access to anything you'd want.=0A=
=0A=0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "Art Plato" <aplato@coldwater.org=
>=0ASent: Monday, November 9, 2015 2:38pm=0ATo: =0ACc: nanog@nanog.org=0ASu=
bject: Re: Favorite GPON Vendor?=0A=0A=0A=0ABrian,=0AHow complex is the tro=
ubleshooting side of the Adtran? We Use the Enablence Wave7 and getting any=
useful information from the CPE via the CLI is like pulling hens teeth. I =
have yet to see a way to view the actual throughput on the ethernet interfa=
ces, only total bits passed, or the light levels at the CPE fiber interface=
. A bit annoying actually. It means a truck roll to get light levels at the=
CPE.=0A=0AArt.=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0AFrom: "Brian R" <brians=
upport@hotmail.com>=0ATo: "Eric Rogers" <ecrogers@precisionds.com>, "Jay Pa=
tel" <clecny@gmail.com>=0ACc: nanog@nanog.org=0ASent: Monday, November 9, 2=
015 2:25:44 PM=0ASubject: Re: Favorite GPON Vendor?=0A=0AWe use the Adtran =
ONT solutions. We are using AE (Active Ethernet) not GPON but the solutions=
are similar for Adtran. We are providing IP and Analog this way. If used i=
n the specified scope only there have been very little problems. Adtran is =
constantly updating their firmware, this can be a positive and negative at =
times. LoL=0A=0AThe configuration is Adtran TA5000 with an Active Ethernet =
24-Port Module (1187562F1) feeding an ONT TA324E (1287737G2) at the custome=
r premise.=0AFor power we are using the Cyber Power CSN27U12v-NA3 units.=0A=
The clam shell we are using to put the ONT in is TA350 ONT NID HSG SPLICE (=
1187770G1)=0AAll of these part numbers should be available on Adtrans websi=
te to look up.=0A=0AWe are also testing some iPhotonix ONTs but have not go=
tten to the point we are sure we want to deploy them.=0A=0ABrian=0A=0APS I =
will post this in voiceops as well (it may be more relevant there)=0A=0A___=
_____________________________________=0AFrom: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.or=
g> on behalf of Eric Rogers <ecrogers@precisionds.com>=0ASent: Monday, Nove=
mber 9, 2015 10:09 AM=0ATo: Jay Patel; nanog@nanog.org=0ASubject: RE: Favor=
ite GPON Vendor?=0A=0AI Personally would like to know as well. We are just =
getting into GPON and the equipment we have been evaluating is clunky at be=
st... It came highly recommended and supposed to be stable.=0A=0AEric Roger=
s=0APDS Connect=0Awww.pdsconnect.me=0A(317) 831-3000 x200=0A=0A=0A-----Orig=
inal Message-----=0AFrom: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf =
Of Jay Patel=0ASent: Monday, November 9, 2015 9:50 AM=0ATo: nanog@nanog.org=
=0ASubject: Favorite GPON Vendor?=0A=0AWho is your favorite GPON OLT/ONU Ve=
ndor? Why? I am looking for=0Arecommendations=0A=0AI apologize in advance ,=
if you feel my question is inappropriate for this mailing list ( feel free=
to point me to right forum/mailing list).=0A=0ARegards,=0AJay.
