[185393] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGP choice
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Oct 26 12:18:24 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:55:46 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
In-Reply-To: <20151025013814.GA4816@gweep.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>> i may have missed it, but one of my fave features of is-is is that it is
>> a link-local non-ip protocol. hard to disrupt/attack remotely.
> This is overlooked far too often IMNSHO. As is the comparison of
> error/attack surface of "feature-rich" OSPF against "lean" IS-IS.
i just wish the is-is protocol folk had not suffered from so much ospf
feature envy and garbaged it up in a futile attempt to penetrate the
enterprise.
randy
