[184834] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IGP choice
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Mikulasik)
Thu Oct 22 15:21:44 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
To: Damien Burke <damien@supremebytes.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:21:37 +0000
In-Reply-To: <2FD50E6D13594B4C93B743BFCF9F52842FE91667@EXCH01.sb.local>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
And Windows Server for your routing platform of choice!
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Damien Burke
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:12 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: IGP choice
Just use rip for *everything*
Problem solved!
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:41 AM
To: marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IGP choice
On 22/Oct/15 18:57, marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
> IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what=20
> reason ?
> Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some=20
> international ISP/carriers design choice, please.
The "everything must connect to Area 0" requirement of OSPF was limiting fo=
r me back in 2008.
So we moved to IS-IS.
Mark.
