[184801] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Irony.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Oct 20 09:10:21 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:10:07 +0900
In-Reply-To: <561CD563.3070707@netassist.ua>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Max Tulyev wrote:

> On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.

Certainly.

> Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...

Customer support for IPv6 costs a lot, at least because of:

   1) Unnecessarily lengthy IP addresses, not recognized by most, if not
      all, customers

   2) Lack of so promised automatic renumbering

   3) So stateful SLAAC

> So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6
> adoption ;)

Upgrade IETF to upgrade IPv6.

							Masataka Ohta


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post