[184705] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Irony.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Oct 15 15:23:04 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTceKzV13GKUWdQa-spXoCrTvB+hds9AzvvP4GCqmEySA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:53 -0700
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Getting IPv6 to the masses without giving them the ability to get their =
IPv6 problems
resolved seems not like a long-tail issue so much as a really poor =
choice of deployment
plans.
Just my $0.02.
Owen
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 20:17 , Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher@f5.com> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far =
IPv6
>> has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support =
today
>> Ironic.
>>=20
>> Oh wait..
>>=20
>> Hi, my name is Donn, and I=E2=80=99m speaking for=E2=80=A6 myself.
>>=20
>> Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters =
of
>> IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. =
And
>> being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. =
A
>> static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
>>=20
>> :sigh:
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
> Tech support websites are long tail
>=20
> Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in
> high traffic use cases.
>=20
> Sighing about edge cases in the long tail with ipv6 ... Not sure what =
you
> expect.
>=20
> <deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has =
caused me
> outtages>
>=20
> CB
