[184685] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Microsoft blocking mail
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tei)
Thu Oct 15 09:50:18 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1509180844250.41605@z.fncre.vasb>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:50:14 +0200
From: Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 18 September 2015 at 10:45, Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Tei wrote:
>
>> On 18 September 2015 at 04:48, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf@dessus.com> wrote=
:
>> >
>> > Being blocked is probably a good thing ...
>>
>>
>> CGI forms that do the validation in the serverside are not up to
>> modern expectations*. You want to do validation clientside.
>
> If you do client-side and no server-side, you have a huge security proble=
m.
>
> ~Marcin
By now is a industry standard.
You have to do the validation serverside and clientside. This of
course mean duplicated code.
( Excessively clever people have tried to solve the problem by using
the same language/code in both the clientside and serverside. But
this feels to me like a overreaction and you will be writing code
unrelated to this in a new (?) language.... On top the... heurhg...
creative pipelining.. to make the whole fa=C3=A7ade works.)
Collesterol High Clients + Collesterol High Servers.
Unrelated:
this is a funny article
http://carlos.bueno.org/2014/11/cache.html
--=20
--
=E2=84=B1in del =E2=84=B3ensaje.
