[184673] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Kirch)
Wed Oct 14 16:43:53 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2pp0hproo.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:43:49 -0400
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Minimal? Probably 22LR. I prefer 458SOCOM though. As Bob Evans notes,
there may be some waiting periods, serial numbers, and background checks
involved. :)
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> >> http://www.procmail.org/
> > I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no
> > obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet
> > services to them, including SMTP services.
>
> computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is
> the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time?
>
> randy
>
