[184451] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Sat Oct 3 14:34:59 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2io6nnc32.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 13:34:55 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
So let me ask a question -- there's several folks looking at overall IPv6
usage, but what about on a per-protocol level, and compared to IPv4?
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 11:37 AM
To: Scott Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force
rapid ipv6 adoption")
> Also, good luck trying to shove the IPv6 genie back into the bottle.
the problem is not getting it into the bottle. the problem is getting
it out, at scale.
when you actually measure, cgn and other forms of nat are now massive.
it is horrifying.
randy
