[184396] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Oct 2 14:38:56 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <560E0C44.5060002@invaluement.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:35:24 -0700
To: Rob McEwen <rob@invaluement.com>
Cc: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


> On Oct 1, 2015, at 21:47 , Rob McEwen <rob@invaluement.com> wrote:
>=20
> On 10/2/2015 12:18 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> A hoster can get /48's for each customer.  Each customer is =
technically
>> a seperate site.  It's this stupid desire to over conserve IPv6
>> addresses that causes this not IPv6.
>=20
> In theory, yes. In practice, I'm skeptical. I think many will =
sub-delegate /64s

Then as another poster suggested, they deserve whatever pain they suffer =
from this.

Mark is correct=85 It is the ISP=92s poor decision in these cases that =
is the problem. Not the SPAM block and not IPv6.

>=20
> Plus, nobody has yet addressed the fact that new /48s will be just so =
EASY to obtain since they are going to be plentiful... therefore... the =
LACK of scarcity will make hosters and ESP... NOT be very motivated to =
keep their IP space clean... as is the case now with IPv4.

That=92s not as true as you want to believe it to be.

While /48s are not scarce globally, there is a significant cost to going =
back to the RIR for a larger allocation. You have to show active =
utilization of your existing space in order to get more.

As such, ISPs are going to be motivated not to treat blocks as =
disposable entities.

> Also, it seems so bizarre that in order to TRY to solve this, we have =
to make sure that MASSIVE numbers of individual IPv6 IP addresses.. that =
equal numbers that my calculate can't reach (too many digits)... would =
all be allocated to one single combined usage scenario. Then allocating =
only /48s multiples that number by 65K. Mind boggling

You=92ll get over that eventually. Once you get some experience with the =
conveniences and other advantages it brings, it=92s actually pretty easy =
to wrap your head around.


Owen


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post