[184381] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo Slabbert)
Fri Oct 2 12:47:21 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com>
To: Damian Menscher <damian@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABSP1Oej9DD+P+jqdyTGKpLs+t-ydTCakE=n-dDva1p12mJynQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--R2Mail21ca3dcf9-855f-43cd-8f39-0e2a5e084107
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My apologies; missed the anchor for some reason and just got the top bits of the doc.
--
Hugo
hugo@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber
also on TextSecure & RedPhone
---- From: Damian Menscher <damian@google.com> -- Sent: 2015-10-02 - 08:45 ----
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo@slabnet.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu 2015-Oct-01 18:28:52 -0700, Damian Menscher via NANOG <
>> nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:42:57PM +0000, Todd Underwood wrote:
>>>> > it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the
>>>> rest
>>>> > of the internet. it's unfortunate that we made that mistake, but i
>>>> guess
>>>> > we're stuck with that now (i wish i could say something about lessons
>>>> > learned but i don't think any one of us has learned a lesson yet).
>>>>
>>>> Would be really interesting to know how you would propose
>>>> squeezing 128 bits of address data into a 32 bit field so that we
>>>> could all continue to use IPv4 with more addresses than it's has
>>>> available to save having to move to this new incompatible format.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I solved that problem a few years ago (well, kinda -- only for backend
>>> logging, not for routing):
>>>
>>> http://docs.guava-libraries.googlecode.com/git/javadoc/com/google/common/net/InetAddresses.html#getCoercedIPv4Address(java.net.InetAddress)
>>>
>>
>> Squeezing 32 bits into 128 bits is easy. Let me know how you do with
>> squeezing 128 bits into 32 bits...
>>
>
> I did just fine, thanks. (You may want to read the link again.... ;)
>
> Damian
--R2Mail21ca3dcf9-855f-43cd-8f39-0e2a5e084107
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: PGP/MIME digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: BCPG v1.51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=b4Uu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--R2Mail21ca3dcf9-855f-43cd-8f39-0e2a5e084107--
