[184239] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ramy Hashish)
Wed Sep 30 02:05:27 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AEAE5C0D-FE2F-4542-B237-159BF09671A9@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:05:18 +0200
From: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
To: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1@mac.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Again Fabien,

Why didn't you use A10 for both detection and mitigation?

Thanks,

Ramy

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1@mac.com> wrote=
:

> Hello
>
> My 2 cents
> You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you
> have just to play with the API.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabien
>
> > Le 12 ao=C3=BBt 2015 =C3=A0 16:28, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.co=
m> a =C3=A9crit
> :
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
> >> From: "marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr" <marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr>
> >> To: nanog@nanog.org
> >> Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
> >> Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906@yahoo.fr>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dwindows-1252; format=3Dflowed
> >>
> >> anybody from this impressive list ?:
> >>
> >> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
> >>
> >> -- Marcel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in t=
he
> > market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
> >
> > Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
> > positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ramy
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post