|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org To: "Rampley Jr, Jim F" <jim.rampley@charter.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:49:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <D2300873.B17EE%jim.rampley@charter.com> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On 9/29/15 7:26 AM, Rampley Jr, Jim F wrote: > > > On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen" > <nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of sethm@rollernet.us> wrote: > >> On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote: >>> >>> Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-) >>> >>> We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring! >>> >> >> >> Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes. >> >> ~Seth > Hi Seth, which market was this occurring? Was this already removed? I'm > not seeing it this morning. I would like to figure out what went wrong > here. We shouldn't be nailing up any static configuration to have caused > a situation like this. > Reno, NV. I do believe they've finally withdrawn this morning (I just woke up, it was a long night). ~Seth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |