[184044] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN Region IPv4 Free Pool Reaches Zero
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ITechGeek)
Thu Sep 24 16:20:57 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: ITechGeek <itg@itechgeek.com>
X-Google-Original-From: ITechGeek <ITG@itechgeek.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR0701MB1781325A8ED43C81F550AAABFA430@BY1PR0701MB1781.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:20:26 -0400
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
They're already trying - RFC 6598. On the flip side, I'm using subnets from
that range for my home network instead of RFC 1918 space right now.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-ITG (ITechGeek)
ITG@ITechGeek.Com
https://itg.nu/
GPG Keys: https://itg.nu/contact/gpg-key
Preferred GPG Key: Fingerprint: AB46B7E363DA7E04ABFA57852AA9910A DCB1191A
Google Voice: +1-703-493-0128 / Twitter: ITechGeek / Facebook:
http://fb.me/Jbwa.Net
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
wrote:
> Let's just hope carriers don't try to fix IPv4 instead of going to IPv6.
> I'd like my children to grow up in a worlds without cgnat.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Satchell
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 1:38 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: ARIN Region IPv4 Free Pool Reaches Zero
>
> On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> > The issue now is convincing clients that they need it. The other issue
> > is many software vendors still don't support it.
>
> And this may trigger a refresh on routers, as people old or refurbed
> equipment find they need to change. The whole reason for the inertia
> against going to IPv6 is "it ain't broke, so I not gonna 'fix' it."
>
> Now it's broke.
>
>
