[18393] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SPAM, RE: Internic and there lame response

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.D. Falk)
Tue Jul 14 13:54:02 1998

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 10:39:02 -0700
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cp.net>
To: Anthony Sticha <ASticha@in.com.au>, Andrea Di Lecce <slinky@rogerswave.ca>,
        Dean Robb <pceasy@norfolk.infi.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, RS-TALK@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET
Mail-Followup-To: Anthony Sticha <ASticha@in.com.au>,
	Andrea Di Lecce <slinky@rogerswave.ca>,
	Dean Robb <pceasy@norfolk.infi.net>, nanog@merit.edu,
	RS-TALK@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET
In-Reply-To: <01b901bdadcf$c19561b0$3d280fcb@mail.in.com.au>; from Anthony Sticha on Mon, Jul 13, 1998 at 06:00:44AM +1000

On 07/12/98, Anthony Sticha <ASticha@in.com.au> wrote: 

> OK so what to do if their upstream does nothing? Like PBI

	PBI does more than most.  There really aren't any backbones 
	left who do nothing, (with the possible exception of UUnet,
	but that's a relatively recent occurance.)

-- 
J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cp.net>
Special Agent In Charge (Abuse Issues)
Critical Path, Inc.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post