[183873] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sign-On Letter to the Court in the FCC's Net Neutrality Case
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Tykwinski)
Fri Sep 18 19:26:38 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Eric Tykwinski <eric-list@truenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150918222327.GA24664@gsp.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 19:26:12 -0400
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I signed on as well, but why didn=E2=80=99t the EFF at least publish the =
letter to the list?
It was well written and laid out, even for politicians. Personally, I =
would have included some VoIP stuff that=E2=80=99s well known about, but =
"que sera, sera=E2=80=9D. The main point being if you want people to =
sign up, show your cards and let people make the business decision =
whether that will effect their present situation first.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
F: 610-429-3222
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:41:52AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>> Me too. Be sure to actually read the Amicus brief - it's incredibly
>> well written and informative.
>=20
> I've signed on as well and strongly concur with Miles' recommendation.
>=20
> ---rsk
