[1836] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Hannan)
Mon Feb 5 14:31:46 1996
From: Alan Hannan <alan@gi.net>
To: amb@Xara.NET (Alex.Bligh)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:11:54 -0600 (CST)
Cc: iljitsch@unix1.bart.nl, amb@Xara.NET, Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net,
nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org, iab@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu,
iana@isi.edu, local-ir@ripe.net
In-Reply-To: <199601291642.QAA09648@diamond.xara.net> from "Alex.Bligh" at Jan 29, 96 04:42:34 pm
......... Alex.Bligh is rumored to have said:
] > No they don't. You can ask the RIPE NCC for special PI space to assign to
] > this customer. It seems they have a "chemical waste dump" to satisfy
] > this kind of requests from.
] Ah. That will be the "chemical waste dump" that Daniel K said
] he didn't care about whether it got routed or not (no offence
] Daniel - neither do I), and is all but unaggregatable so presumably
] Sprintlink et al. won't want to waste their CPUs routing it as well.
] What hope for a customer with those IP numbers?
Learn how to renumber. It really is possible, you know.
-alan
