[183445] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Wed Sep 2 06:11:32 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 17:11:25 +0700
In-Reply-To: <55E6C603.7040305@seacom.mu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 2 Sep 2015, at 16:48, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Those VLAN's and VRF's are following the same path as the global
> table, just in a different routing table. That is easy, and we do that
> already.
Sure. But it's better than mixing it in with customer traffic.
> Your assertion, before, was that the OoB network is physically
> separate from the routers it is supporting. This is less feasible at
> scale.
Ideally, it should be - that's what I was trying to get across. I
understand that this isn't free, either from a capex or opex
perspective.
-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
