[183414] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Tue Sep 1 18:47:04 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 05:39:37 +0700
In-Reply-To: <013f01d0e4f7$2fc885b0$8f599110$@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 2 Sep 2015, at 3:45, Chuck Church wrote:
> Most OOB is lacking redundancy too, so a single failure can really
> take the shine off an OOB deployment.
Even if you're using old, grandfathered equipment for it, there's no
reason why your OOB/DCN can't have a reasonable degree of redundancy.
Since, it's like, *what you use to control your entire network*.
Underinvesting in management capabilities and capacities has always been
a problem, of course. Some organizations just won't learn until they've
gone through a disaster or three.
-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
