[183403] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Sep 1 16:13:18 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Tarko Tikan <tarko@lanparty.ee>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
In-Reply-To: <55E600BD.80701@lanparty.ee>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 16:13:04 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1441138384_2129P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:47:09 +0300, Tarko Tikan said:
> hey,
>
> > It should've already been spent for an OOB/DCN network, which should've
> > been provisioned with flow telemetry in mind.
>
> Bad advice. No amount of money will fix major platforms that are not
> happy to export flow telemetry via router management ports.
And that box ended up in your rack, why exactly?
<insert excuses that boil down to "We were willing to accept gear that didn't
have this functionality because we were OK with sending flow telemetry over
the inband network">
--==_Exmh_1441138384_2129P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=FhQn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1441138384_2129P--
