[183278] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Tue Aug 25 08:32:16 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Brian Turnbow <b.turnbow@twt.it>, 'Scott Granados' <scott@granados-llc.net>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:32:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: <00c9ad74c7.0001d0df30.000446dd79.0000001a4b@twt.it>
Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>,
"'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 25/Aug/15 14:23, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> Or use uRPF with an acl.
> You can specify what to block and what not to block and use S/RTBH as w=
ell.
Even though we're not receiving the full feed on dedicated peering
routers, you're talking at least 35% of it. Sometimes more...
Mark.
