[183241] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Production-scale NAT64
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Thu Aug 20 13:22:26 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGV==1SoDR_PKXVo852+t0c+cojT-poMo5X+cz1PveoNjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:22:23 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Jawaid Shell2 <jb@forethought.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:36 AM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Jawaid Shell2 <jb@forethought.net> wrote:
> > Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you
> using?
>
> You used "NAT64" and "production" in the same sentence. Good one.
>
> Seriously though, if you want to run a v6-only network and still
> support access to IPv4 Internet resources, consider 464XLAT or
> DS-Lite.
>
>
NAT64 is a required component of 464XLAT.
And, it runs at very meaningful production scale in non-trivial network
deployments.
CB
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
> --
> William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
>
