[183171] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A multi-tenant firewall for an MSSP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Johnston)
Mon Aug 17 02:47:21 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAC2aK2o7666GsOcGd+zNFyKDadsrw4pZ5M=0oc3zwNMn-ght0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:47:15 +0100
To: Rakesh M <raaki.88@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>,
Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
sophos utm works great :)
Colin
> On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M <raaki.88@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are relatively =
happy
> about it. Not directly experienced though.
>=20
> Thanks
> Rakesh
>=20
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish =
<ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>=20
>> Hello All,
>>=20
>> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start =
providing
>> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience =
on
>> this, and if there are any recommendations for the UTM's vendor.
>>=20
>> People/customers here are more familiar with the Fortigate, however, =
we
>> need to build a well-rounded solution that suits wide range of =
enterprises'
>> business needs.
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>>=20
>> Ramy
>>=20
