[183113] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BRAS sugestion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Aug 14 12:22:18 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Clayton Zekelman <clayton@MNSi.Net>,
Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br>, Julian Eble <julianeble@yahoo.com.br>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:22:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1439568478_5548@surgemail.mnsi.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 14/Aug/15 18:07, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>
> We just bought a couple of MX480s for B-RAS to replace some aging
> Cisco 7206/VXRs. Not racked or powered yet (showed up yesterday), but
> hope to have one of them online for testing next week.
>
> Our initial test with an eval MX-80 verified functionality.
I like that Juniper finally dropped further development of the dedicate
BRAS code. It had become annoying.
Mark.
