[182984] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Tantsura)
Fri Aug 7 02:05:51 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
To: "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" <penxiao@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:05:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5A34F4AC18539E47A797E3916C0E55B13584A189@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hi Peng,
Good stuff!
Any plans for multicast, RTC and EVPN AF's?
Regards,
Jeff
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Peng Xiao (penxiao) <penxiao@cisco.com> wrote=
:
>=20
> Hi guys,
>=20
> Ipv6 and other address families are under development. We have already de=
signed the data structures for them as you can see from the documentation, =
but it's just some testing code and not stable and we are not doing them af=
ter careful consideration.
> But at last, they will come out.
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]=20
> Sent: 2015=1B$BG/=1B(B8=1B$B7n=1B(B7=1B$BF|=1B(B 0:16
> To: Peng Xiao (penxiao)
> Cc: Jahangir Hossain; xxnog@ledeuns.net; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementat=
ion
>=20
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:25:55 -0000, "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" said:
>> Currently, yabgp does not support IPv6 address family. We only support I=
Pv4 now.
>=20
> http://tnx.nl/legacy-ip-only.svg
>=20
> Seriously guys. It's 2015. We really don't care what you hack for your =
own use - but publicly announcing stuff that doesn't have IPv6 support is g=
etting kind of embarassing...
>=20
> *especially* when it's a major vendor open-sourcing their code. (I'm stil=
l willing to cut a *little* slack for "two guys and a stack of empty pizza =
boxes" software....)
>=20
>=20
