[182970] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Thu Aug 6 12:27:52 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <54227.1438877767@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:27:49 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: "Peng Xiao \(penxiao\)" <penxiao@cisco.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:25:55 -0000, "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" said:
>> Currently, yabgp does not support IPv6 address family. We only support IPv4 now.
>
> http://tnx.nl/legacy-ip-only.svg
>
> Seriously guys. It's 2015. We really don't care what you hack for your
> own use - but publicly announcing stuff that doesn't have IPv6 support is
> getting kind of embarassing...
>
> *especially* when it's a major vendor open-sourcing their code. (I'm still
> willing to cut a *little* slack for "two guys and a stack of empty pizza
> boxes" software....)
note that the list of 'references' for yabgp includes:
RFC2545
RFC4798
RFC5701
and this interesting snippet:
address-family ipv6 unicast
>
>
