[182680] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Working with Spamhaus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Jul 29 13:14:56 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f96ef04f0d136583821f368f9dc84452.squirrel@66.201.44.180>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:14:49 -0700
To: bob@FiberInternetCenter.com
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
<delurk>
They come to M3AAWG on a regular basis and there=E2=80=99s the M3AAWG =
hosting SIG that you might want to participate in.
NANOG doesn=E2=80=99t always have a mail abuse (and not very many =
network abuse) session on the agenda, plus just how many people doing =
routing or DNS seem to even care what their colleagues down the hall in =
the abuse team are doing or which conferences they attend?
I remember a time (under the previous list management) when discussing =
spam here was deemed OT and non operational - off list warnings, =
suspensions and such. Ancient history I guess, but still ..
</delurk>
=E2=80=94srs
> On 29-Jul-2015, at 10:06 AM, Bob Evans <bob@FiberInternetCenter.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Would be nice to have an RBL service that attended NANOG meetings.
> Would make for a more trusted RBL we can tell customers to make use.
> Spamhaus ever attend a NANOG meetings ?
> Thank You
> Bob Evans
> CTO
