[182496] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun Jul 19 02:01:10 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <55A92A8B.5070208@ttec.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:00:47 -0700
To: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 09:17 , Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Jul 16, 2015, at 15:29 , Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> All I am advocating is that if ever another draft standard comes =
along to enable people to try and make something of it, lead follow or =
get out of the way.
>>=20
>> Sometimes good leadership is knowing when to say =E2=80=9Cnot just =
no, but hell no.=E2=80=9D
>>=20
>> Owen
>=20
> This is not one of them. Your stated reason for hell no is that you =
want no distractions from ipv6 rollout. That is not leadership. That is =
dictatorship via tyranny of the minority, enabled by consensus,
Tryanny of the minority enabled by consensus=E2=80=A6 That=E2=80=99s an =
amusing concept.
If we were such a minority, how did we get consensus.
Reality check, Joe=E2=80=A6 You=E2=80=99re pretty much the only one left =
still beating this drum.
Owen
