[182447] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP in NYC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul S.)
Fri Jul 17 03:20:32 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:20:31 +0900
In-Reply-To: <2A3E401F-D247-4B3B-AAAE-B999C95C5DAD@gt86car.org.uk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Rather than a peer, it might be an okay idea to try out peering at NYIIX
(and if the funds permit to get transport, AMS-IX/DE-CIX).
You'll quickly find that peering is *very* useful in Europe, if you have
any EU bound traffic at all.
On 7/17/2015 午後 04:06, Colin Johnston wrote:
> good isp's / peers are in no particular order
> bt
> telstra ex psinet uk/eu
>
> colin
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 17 Jul 2015, at 07:52, Jared Geiger <jared@compuwizz.net> wrote:
>>
>> HE uses Telia for Transit. So you won't gain much redundancy there. I would
>> go with Cogent if you have lots of European customers and North American
>> business customers. One not on your list is Level3. They would be strong in
>> that blend too.
>>
>> You might also try joining a peering point. You'll gain a lot by just
>> peering with the route servers.
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Dovid Bender <dovid@telecurve.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are looking to peer with another ISP in NY. My options are:
>>> Telia
>>> Tata
>>> Cogent
>>>
>>> We currently have (and will keep):
>>> HE
>>> NTT
>>> TELX (They use NTT and HE and we are looking to replace them).
>>>
>>> We need an ISP that has a good peering/connectivity in Europe and Asia
>>> (Israel specific).
>>>
>>> Any advice on who to go with?
>>>
