[182407] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Jul 16 08:23:22 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:23:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3772.1436975354@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 15/Jul/15 17:49, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> There isn't any technical reason that an organization can't fix its edge
> so it doesn't urinate bad IPv6 traffic all over the Internet.
Some hardware does not support uRPF, for example.
ACL's would work, but there are administrative scaling issues. Still,
better to have that than nothing at all.
Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=7ivn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
