[182380] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Maimon)
Wed Jul 15 19:40:19 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:35:56 -0400
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
To: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>,
Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.x1tz9mx9tfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:08 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>>> That's the big difference - IPv6 has been designed to provide abundant
>>>> address space.
>>>
>>> There is no amount of fixed address space that can't be consumed with
>>> stupid allocation policies.
>>
>> True. However, are you making the argument that any of the current or
>> proposed allocation policies are, in fact, stupid in such a way that
>> this is likely?
>
> What seems like a great idea today becomes tomorrow's "what the f***
> were they thinking".
>
>
There will be ample evidence of what any and all of were saying.
Thinking, maybe not.
