[182376] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Wed Jul 15 17:53:43 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Barry Shein" <bzs@world.std.com>, "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:53:38 -0400
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <356637FD-272E-4092-9BA9-73FA52740B4C@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:34:13 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> That covers multicast and RFC-1918. Are there any other IPv4
> segmentations that you can think of?
...
> Given that we came up with 3 total segmentations in IPv4 over the course
#1-3,#4 RFC-1918 is 3 "segments" and we recently added a 4th (for CGN).
#5 Localhost (127/8)
#6 Multicast (224/4)
#7 "Class E" (240/4)
#8 0/8
#9 255/8 (technically, part of class e, but it's called out specifically
in various RFCs)
