[182347] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jul 15 11:49:36 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "15 Jul 2015 15:25:05 -0000."
<20150715152505.26352.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:49:14 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1436975354_2225P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 15 Jul 2015 15:25:05 -0000, "John Levine" said:
> It would be nice if it were possible to implement BCP 38 in IPv6, since this
> is the reason it isn't in IPv4.
There isn't any technical reason that an organization can't fix its edge
so it doesn't urinate bad IPv6 traffic all over the Internet.
--==_Exmh_1436975354_2225P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=TARz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1436975354_2225P--
