[182338] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chuck Church)
Wed Jul 15 09:00:42 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Chuck Church" <chuckchurch@gmail.com>
To: "'John R. Levine'" <johnl@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1507141649470.32731@ary.lan>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:00:28 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
-----Original Message-----
From: John R. Levine [mailto:johnl@iecc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM
To: Chuck Church <chuckchurch@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
>This is IPv6. Why shouldn't they have their own PI space?
Same way it happens today. Business starts out small, uses IP space from
their single ISP. Couple years later, they're bigger and want to dual-home
for better uptime or other reasons. Unless there is something stopping them
from advertising their ISP 'A' space out to ISP 'B' in IPv6 land, we're
probably going to see the same things we see with IPv4 no?
Chuck
