[182283] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Huff)
Tue Jul 14 17:09:44 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, Chuck Church <chuckchurch@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:09:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1507141649470.32731@ary.lan>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Exactly.
As a business entity and not a provider, we wouldn't have even contemplated=
deploying IPv6 without PI addresses. The myth of easy renumbering and/or h=
aving multiple prefixes/address per host for failover still shows up from t=
ime to time, but mostly gets ignored (at least in the corporate world). Rem=
ember SHIM?=20
Any reasonable size organization that expects reliable internet connections=
is going to go BGP/PI.
----
Matthew Huff=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Operations=A0=A0=A0| Purchase, NY 10577
OTA Management LLC=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 | Fax:=A0=A0 914-694-5669
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
> What about dual-homed customers? Or are they all expected to have their =
own
> PI space?
This is IPv6. Why shouldn't they have their own PI space?
R's,
John
