[182269] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mel Beckman)
Tue Jul 14 16:00:05 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org>
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:45:42 +0000
In-Reply-To: <23735.1436902536@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We're talking about end user assignments made by ISPs, not ISP assignments.=
An ISP's /32 is likely the only entry one needs in the FIB.=20
-mel beckman
> On Jul 14, 2015, at 12:41 PM, "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks=
@vt.edu> wrote:
>=20
> On 14 Jul 2015 18:44:25 -0000, "John Levine" said:
>=20
>> routers does not. The right way to allocate v6 space is the first
>> time someone asks for some, give them as much as they'll ever need.
>> If you give them less and they have to come back for more later,
>> you've wasted a router slot.
>=20
> Amen. Integers are cheap. FIB slots cost real money.
