[182206] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Peach)
Mon Jul 13 08:02:47 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:02:18 -0400
From: John Peach <john-nanog@peachfamily.net>
To: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
In-reply-to: <20150713033813.GI3716@bender.unx.cpp.edu>
Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Sig_/+WrWuk9dSFS6ZTl0GilF5U2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:38:13 -0700
"Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 05:35:35PM -0400, John Peach wrote:
> > and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I
> > can send email from home because they don't even use TLS..... Having
>=20
> Hmm, I just recently set up my mail client to use Verizon's smtp
> servers, and TLS seemed to work fine for me. smtp.verizon.net port
> 465, smtps. Took me a while to sort out smtp.verizon.net vs
> relay.verizon.net vs outgoing.verizon.net, but once I found the right
> one it's been working fine.
smtps was deprecated years ago and is not implemented in postfix, hence
the need for stunnel. I should have said they don't implement STARTTLS
on either 25 or 587.
--Sig_/+WrWuk9dSFS6ZTl0GilF5U2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVo6jOAAoJEFkW2a9BKTSsFH8H/j1+kRpFqaNMjR6K7YHtVFDY
nRXZCY7o4yX1dF8iRdhCMozEX1GFREC6RQRZYDgAaBeS2KWC3qnG1YWxKoL2UV6B
vG1dROT7NQKmQqoKA1UTz/SOizaJSrrtmfGMXDpzcjsWPn2WsZIdIqZboQnEah0A
6vLN68qPh8rlnialZ2wESmY1pyqJT2abPHVXDrT/fGjtjGBi//WqDBTIQfKgYtCY
d67Ui2F++l5aDBNA8zGmOTsmJR7kQ5jkY7wfTuUt2qwqHvT0tGRxOqlJnKwWDelc
+WUT/VLypXYcmQGudqEYA1XciR7MCxCE/MKob698vYDnonUN0hQZhCqQgoNNAq0=
=E4n6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/+WrWuk9dSFS6ZTl0GilF5U2--
