[182160] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sat Jul 11 01:56:07 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <55A0ADD8.6010601@studio442.com.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:56:00 -0700
To: Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yes, but TBH, they are advertised as a darkspace collection project, so =
Cisco=E2=80=99s use is actually somewhat helpful to that activity.
It=E2=80=99s unlikely that 1.1.1.0/24 or 1.2.3.0/24 will ever be =
allocated by APNIC.
Owen
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 22:47 , Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 11/07/15 08:25, Shane Ronan wrote:
>> 1.1.1.1 is usually a good bet
>=20
> Sadly yes, even though it's valid public IP space Cisco still have it =
documented as their suggested captive portal address.
>=20
> Despite it (and 1.2.3.0/24) being advertised by $ORK for years at this =
point on behalf of APNIC.
