[182158] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Julien Goodwin)
Sat Jul 11 01:47:17 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:47:04 +1000
From: Julien Goodwin <nanog@studio442.com.au>
To: Shane Ronan <shane@ronan-online.com>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ_LqoF8PP1oK63Miuaxv069LHc43MyDiwMibdktw_1toL8COg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 11/07/15 08:25, Shane Ronan wrote:
> 1.1.1.1 is usually a good bet
Sadly yes, even though it's valid public IP space Cisco still have it
documented as their suggested captive portal address.
Despite it (and 1.2.3.0/24) being advertised by $ORK for years at this
point on behalf of APNIC.
